Cornerstone report: Fukushima SABOTAGE!
This web site is updated multiple times daily. Refresh will not usually work to load it new. Delete all but the IP address and hit enter to get the new page.
TO THOSE SENDING DONATIONS: I cannot reply, even via Paypal. I am THAT censored. All donations received are listed below for at least 3 days in the full amount sent with no abbreviated numbers. Please check below to make sure your donation made it.
Donations will be needed for September
I will need approximately $550 this month ($188 now), provided there is not another "war", thanks!You can donate via Paypal by sending to the firstname.lastname@example.org (preferred) and
All donations will be posted here for at least 3 days to provide secondary confirmation and prevent intercepts.Kurt sent $50 USD via Paypal and the email@example.com mail box, thanks!
Pedro sent 35 Euros via Paypal and the firstname.lastname@example.org mail box, thanks!
Kym sent 20 GPB via Paypal and the email@example.com mail box, thanks!
James sent $25 USD via Paypal and the firstname.lastname@example.org mail box, thanks!
Par sent $134.23 SEK via Paypal and the email@example.com mail box, thanks!
Ralf sent 30 Euros via Paypal and the firstname.lastname@example.org mail box, thanks!
Chris sent $50 USD via Paypal and the email@example.com mail box, thanks!
Don't let this announcement make you lazy if you are a programmer working on another plan, we don't know what will work until they try to shut it all down. I am giving it my best shot, based on what knowledge I have, your unique knowledge will be needed to provide variety to what "they" have to deal with.
TAKE A PICTURE OF THIS IP ADDRESS: 18.104.22.168 AND USE IT TO HIT THIS WEB SITE IF EVERYTHING GETS SHUT DOWN, AS HAS ALREADY BEEN THREATENED REPEATEDLY BY HILLARY. Once you get here, you will be able to get anywhere even if it is all "shut down". I am not showing my cards yet, this will be activated when needed and remember, if things do get shut down and they block the IP address, keep hitting it and it will eventually work because they can't block it 100 percent.September 5 2016
Drudge linked an MSM report about a possible drone strike on Spacex
Remember my post about a UFO or government white hats taking out the spacex rocket that had the $150 million Facebook satellite aboard? Well, Drudge linked this MSM report that only talked about what people were saying and more importantly, did not debunk it.The report instead took my approach and said the debunkers would say it was a bird or bug. The report did not take sides (I did, because to me this is obvious.) If you were skeptical of my take on this, look again, I have bumped it back to the top after Drudge gave it credible air. and will re-iterate that I am absolutely confident either off world help or white hats in the American black op community destroyed this rocket to keep Facebook evil grounded.
The Spacex rocket that blew up with a Facebook satellite aboard was definitely not a technical glitch
It looks like a UFO took it out, REMEMBER, UFO does not mean alien, it just means it is not identified and could be ours.(September 1 2016) a spacex rocket with a $150 million dollar Facebook satellite that was a creation of Zukerberg and Israel blew up during testing, and not during launch. Before it blew up, a UFO showed up, fired something at the rocket, and then quickly flew away. The image here shows the UFO quite clearly. If Spacex can't explain what this UFO is, then I am going to say that either off world help arrived to keep Facebook grounded or white hats in American intelligence destroyed this rocket to keep something evil from being launched.
This UFO appears to be between the rocket and the camera filming the explosion, and the similar focus on the rocket and the object proves the object was close to the rocket and not close to the camera. It is not a bird, insect, or balloon or anything else of the sort. Its speed has been estimated by some people to have been about 500 MPH. It entered on the right hand side of the frame, fired something at the rocket when it was immediately in front of it, and exited the left hand side of the frame.
Obviously there are those trying to say this was a bird or insect or whatever, but this is one case where we got an image that quite clearly shows that cannot possibly be what this was.
This explosion started at the top of the rocket, right where the UFO was, and not near the bottom, where virtually all rocket explosions start. No malfunction caused this, if this started at the top of the rocket only a fuel tank breach in an upper stage that was not being tested could have caused this, and that means the rocket was most likely shot with something. ADDITIONALLY, if someone knew how the rocket was built (U.S. intelligence would,) and they wanted to make darn good and sure the satellite was completely and totally destroyed, hitting the fuel tank immediately below it would be the most rational place because it leaves the least to chance.
Important: Original reports were that this happened when they were test firing the main engines before launch, and not during refueling, as is being said now, which could (tenuously) be used as an explanation for this. But original reports said nothing about refueling, and that there was an engine test underway, which means an explosion at the top of the rocket due to a glitch is not in any way plausible.
There are a few people in the alt media that are claiming that there a war going on in space, and that something off world is trying to help us. If this object is from off world and it blew up a Facebook satellite, I'd have to say someone is trying to help because I can't imagine what was actually on that rocket if it was a completely Jewish/Israeli project and cost $150 million. That would be a GOOD rocket blast as far as I see it, and as far as I see it the only question is, who did it?
I find it interesting that this particular object looks like a text book UFO. Obviously the video of this is going to get edited.
UPDATE: The original video that had this has already been blocked on Youtube, I can't get to it anymore, with links saying the connection failed. At least this is a nice clear screen capture. And I'd bet that if this video does appear again, the UFO will suddenly have flapping wings or some other B.S.
In the original video however, what you see in this frame is what it was. Some people are speculating that it was someone like Soros who blew this rocket up because they do not want space to be privatized. However, my take on this is that if this was a 100 percent Jewish project that was destroyed, no one in the world's power structure (which is now almost entirely Jewish) did this from the top down. I could be wrong, maybe there are disagreements, but I think it is far more probable that this was done by white hats, or "outside help", because nothing could be worse (or wanted by the elite) more than scamming Facebook going orbital compliments of Israel. We don't know what that satellite really was.
I have gone over the video again, and still say a UFO took out the Facebook rocket
It was NOT a bird!There are five video frames that have the UFO in them despite the UFO going across the entire field of view. And all the video frames show the UFO quite clearly. This is only possible with an extremely high end video camera that had an expensive lens and super fast shutter. Why does this matter? Answer: Because it proves the UFO was very close to the rocket, and not a nearby bird. I'll go into this in detail:
Cell phones and cheap video cameras have tiny CCD sensors behind small lenses. This makes it impossible to get a clear image of a small fast moving object because the CCD needs time to gather enough light to expose a frame, and any fast moving object that crosses the entire frame in only five frames will look like a blur, and not a defined object. Why does this matter? Well, because:
Super expensive video cameras have large sensors behind expensive multi element optics that focus within a specific range the camera is set to focus on. The large sensor and wide open optics allows a fast shutter speed, which will put a clear image of a fast moving object in each frame. That is what we have with the UFO video, which proves an expensive camera filmed it. WHY IS THAT IMPORTANT? Because that alone proves that whatever this UFO was, was close to the rocket, and not a nearby bird. If it was a nearby bird, it might not have shown up in the image at all because the lens on that type of camera has a depth of field, which blurs anything that has a distance significantly different than what the lens is focusing on. Since the focus on both the rocket and the UFO are virtually identical, it proves the UFO was much larger than any bird and close to the rocket. Any bird that was close enough to the camera to show up that big would have been so out of focus it might not even noticeably show up in the frame if it was moving that fast. The way this was captured alone proves this video frame capture is legit. Now onto other details that are far more obvious:
The biggest giveaway that this is not a bird in any of these frames is the fact that the object looks the same in all frames and has a straight path across all frames. Birds flap their wings, and if it was a bird, that alone would have changed the appearance of the object. If any bird went across that large a distance without flapping it's wings, it would have fallen noticeably. Additionally, no bird could possibly fly that fast across a frame, relative to it's size on the frame. A bird would have had to have gone more than 100 mph to go that fast through the frame. There are no birds that can do that in straight and level flight.
Additionally, scam spam videos are rapidly being produced with a bird in the frames. That is not what this was, no ifs or buts. If it was a bird, this would not have been needed for debunking purposes.
This capture has an image of either a totally new type of drone, or an alien UFO. You take your pick, but whatever this was, it destroyed the rocket and that is all there is to it.
How do I feel about this? PRETTY FREAKING GOOD, it means we have powerful friends that hate Facebook.September 4 2016
Much of the alternative media is under attack today,
(including the old way of doing this one) updates will be in the window today to circumvent thisSeptember 3 2016
Here's a warp speed censored beauty!
Twitter VAPORIZED this post within minutes, good friends of the truth they are!
And WHY would Hillary drop out after the FBI release? How about "they pulled no punches and said her mail server was hacked by a link in a mail that was soliciting porn!"That mail also proved she was using TOR, and is NOT computer illiterate, as she has claimed repeatedly to cover her butt!
YEP, GUCCIFER HACKED HER WITH A MAIL THAT WAS SOLICITING PORN! Let him out of jail IMMEDIATELY!Why is he in jail after doing the world such a favor?
September 2 2016
If this window has not updated, clear your browser cache or open a new private window because the updates will usually not load until you do (more sabotage, but that is manageable by telling people)
August 31 2016
TWO BIG ONES
1. The DHS will be breaking the law and seizing the electoral process.Gee, what could go wrong with having the DHS take over the elections, in full violation of the law? How about: NO PRIVATE PARTY EXIT POLLS WILL BE ALLOWED, AND NO ONE INVESTIGATING ELECTION FRAUD OTHER THAN THE DHS. Gee, what could POSSIBLY go wrong with that?
2. Republican candidate for Florida House District 86, Laurel Bennett, was a bit shocked over the weekend when she discovered that a local West Palm Beach NBC affiliate, WPTV, reported that she had lost a race even though votes hadn't been cast yet. Why do we need voters when it's far easier to just skip straight to the results?The actual vote was cast on Tuesday, the 30th. She was announced the loser on the 28th!
AND YOU KNOW WHAT I DID? When I heard that I said "too hell with life" and ate an entire box of generic fruit loops at 2AM cst, along with a half gallon of milk. This is already a fruit loop election, FAKE AS HELL and it seems the system is so far gone that there is nothing we can do about getting it stolen, just like every election after Reagan. Yeah, people might have been blind enough to put Bush 1 in, but Clinton and the rest? NO WAY IN HELL. Lead is going to have to fly. A threat of true law enforcement and subsequent law enforcement by, of, and for the people is the only chance we have left. Sorry I had to say it.
Trump is going to MexicoToday, (Wednesday) Trump is going to Mexico to meet with Mexico's President Pena Nieto and he is bringing along other top political figures from America, including Rudy Giuliani. No details given about the trip, and Trump is going to try to dodge the press.
The links will be restored to this side of the page if I can actually work now, rather than deal with "problems."