This site uses no cookies, and no private data is collected or given out. Contact: email@example.com
Cornerstone report: Fukushima SABOTAGE!
This web site is updated daily. If it looks the same as yesterday, CLICK HERE.
Every report on this web site is public domain and can be re-posted in full. Just mention this web site by linking back to the original here
All donations received are logged here in the full amount sent for at least 3 days WITHOUT EXCEPTION to provide confirmation (I cannot send mails) and avoid having them get stolen. thanks!Kim sent $25 CAD via Paypal and the firstname.lastname@example.org mail box, thanks!
July 23 2016
PEOPLE ARE NOW HUNTING FOR THE TWITTER PICTURE THAT PROVES THE SAME MOSSAD AGENT THAT FILMED NICE ALSO FILMED THE MUNICH ATTACK, THUS PROVING THE MOSSAD DID BOTH. TWITTER DELETED THAT PICTURE AND POST. NOT TO WORRY, IT IS ALL DOCUMENTED HERE, AS PART OF MY POST "THE TRUMP LITMUS TEST".
The Trump litmus testHow can anyone, including me, know Trump is real? The answer, for me, is easy.
The normal mail box is the answer. I have not been able to tend the message window for months due to several reasons. That is why nothing from it has been posted lately. That has made the regular mail, which is totally censored except for what the enemy wants to allow through, as the only way I have gotten mail lately.
WHAT GETS THROUGH TO THE REGULAR MAIL BOX, WHICH IS CLEARLY CENSORED EVEN FOR FAMILY AND FRIENDS, WHERE THEY WON'T EVEN LET KNOWN MAILS FROM THEM THROUGH? ANTI TRUMP STUFF.Gee, by censoring my box, the enemy has clearly shown that Trump is the ONLY CANDIDATE. Far and away, over the top real. Come on now, you mean to tell me that when, in the past, I was accessing the message window that does not get censored, there was practically no anti Trump mail there, yet in the regular box that gets almost completely censored, only anti Trump stuff and other assorted "this web site sucks" trollage gets through? HA HA HA, KEY LITMUS TEST.
Thank you for confirming Trump is real, any blind idiot could see that just from how the scamming MSM reacts to the guy.
And oh, about the Mossad operations in France and Germany - yep it is confirmed.The Mossad did France and Germany. Proof got expunged from the web post haste, but I have all the proof captured here, complete with proof they censored it. GUESS WHAT? The exact same guy who photographed the truck attack was miraculously in Germany for the mall shooting, where he got all the great shots of that too! AND GUESS WHAT? HIS WIFE IS PROVEN MOSSAD. How cute is that? As cute as an anti trump rip in the normal in box, which is obviously from the Mossad or some other turd.
OK, HERE IT IS: Censorship confirmed. Twitter wiped this, but it was possible to pick up the pieces.
Jul 22 2016
The way this web site runs has been changed to circumvent attacks.
I can't believe it looks this normal with how differently it is now running after only a day's work.The site now functions completely differently. Long story. If you want to re-post an article, use the link to the text.
For text of the following white block (which can be copied) click here this had to be done to make the web site functional after the new attacks against it.I will figure out how to make all of this match better, for now at least I have it working.
The LA Times suggested a military coup to stop Trump!They also said, once again, that "Hillary is now only ahead by a hair, all the while any credible poll shows Trump bashing her into oblivion, and even the crazy liberal polls showing Trump at least 4 points ahead.
They said Hillary was the only hope for there to not be a war, all the while the Russians are saying Hillary will start one, and Russia is very worried about the prospect of her getting in because they'd rather not have a no-grill Bar-b-q at every back yard in Moscow. Hillary is a pathological no conscience nutcase that would make that happen. Who has more credibility? a liberal rag like the LA times, or the Kremlin? You decide.
Yeah, I guess politics would affect that outcome, but predominantly, who is more credible?
I'd say that if Moscow is saying Hillary will trip off a war with Russia, and if Moscow favors Trump, and Moscow is against tainted vaccines, has banned GMO's, and re-opened their "wild west" to settlers (in their case it would be the wild East) all the while America's BLM is trying to steal all they can from people who have had the land for generations, and then Moscow says Hillary is bad, folks, she's probably bad.
I would also like the LA times to explain exactly how a pile of garbage they published is going to actually sway military support towards Hillary, when predominantly the military hates her guts and loves Trump?
Anyway, if you want to explore a liberal fantasy cesspit, SEE THIS, it is a real treat - you don't get to see an article that is so "out there" that it's sheer nature is news itself every day.
July 20 2016
The copyable text for the "war is really close" report is here
July 16/17/18 2016
I know about the "Baton Rouge shootings" but am staying on the following topic for another day, because it irrevocably proves the truck attack in Nice was 100 percent phony, (and therefore most likely the Baton Rouge shootings are phony.) If we are going to get anywhere on the "terror" topic, people have to see this, have it sink in, and distribute it far and wide. WE NEVER GET ANYTHING AS OBVIOUS AS THIS TO KILL LIES WITH, THEY TOTALLY BLEW IT, ARCHIVE, POST, AND CONVERT THE BLIND OVER TO THE TRUTH.
NOW MORE THAN BULLET STICKERS, THEY USED A FLAT ENDED WRECKING BAR TO POKE "BULLET HOLES" IN THE METAL! ANOTHER BUST!
You can't get a clear picture of the bullet holes in the metal on the truck. I FOUND OUT WHY. It is because they were obviously poked into the metal with a wrecking bar!
ALL OF THESE "BULLET HOLES" IN THE METAL ON THE SIDE OF THE TRUCK ARE NOW PROVEN TO "SUPPOSED TO BE" STRAIGHT ON POINT BLANK SHOTS ACCORDING TO THE "SHOOT OUT" VIDEO. IN THAT VIDEO NOT A SINGLE ONE THAT HIT THE SIDE WAS FIRED FROM THE FRONT OF THE TRUCK. THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY ELONGATED BULLET HOLES ON THE SIDE OF THE TRUCK. YET, NOT ONLY ARE THEY ELONGATED, THEY ARE ALL RECTANGULAR WITH SQUARE CORNERS. SO EITHER THE POLICE SHOOT RECTANGULAR BULLETS NOW, OR A WRECKING BAR WAS USED, THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THIS HAPPENED, AND IT EXPLAINS PERFECTLY WHY YOU CAN'T FIND ANY CRYSTAL CLEAR BULLET PICTURES OF THE SIDE OF THIS TRUCK ANYWHERE. IT ALSO EXPLAINS WHY THERE ARE NO EXIT HOLES. Despite the censorship, someone managed to get a picture of the holes that was good enough even if it was not "crystal clear".Obvious problems with the Nice terror attack:
1. None of the video shows the truck actually hit anyone.
2. They lied about the truck going through barricades and into a "people only" area. The truck only goes down a street with existing traffic, where if people are watching out like they should, they would not get hit. And it was not going fast at all, like it would be on a death mission. The death toll could not have been this high. If he was lucky, he would have hit only one or two people even if he went full speed through red light crosswalks which were never mentioned in the MSM.
3. There is no police shoot out video, despite what claims are. Police simply approach the side of the truck that has no "bullet holes" and go around it. There is no scene at all of them shooting the glass, or putting a single bullet hole in the truck. There is only sound, which could be dubbed in and no glass fragments flying, no holes appearing, NOTHING. All "holes" appear at angles the camera never gets live, despite the fact that the camera followed the police in! This would be done if you used bullet stickers, and had pre existing holes in the cab, on the OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE TRUCK already in place for the still cameras later that the video camera could not ever see because if they were there before the police arrived, it would prove it all fake. We are just supposed to believe this camera guy stayed in the line of fire as the police shot towards him, from the side of the cab you can't see, after they went around it ON THE SAME VIDEO.
When I first heard of this story, I made a few assumptions that were wrong. I assumed the truck swerved and hit people. That was wrong, despite the fact they said it. I assumed the truck went into an area that was blocked off for pedestrians only, down a path way that only people were supposed to be on. I BELIEVED THAT WAS THE STORY, BECAUSE THEY SAID SO. THAT WAS WRONG, IT WAS JUST ON A NORMAL STREET THAT WAS NOT BLOCKED OFF AT ALL.
The entire pretext for this story is so fake it could not possibly happen. It would not be possible to go down any street that is allowing normal traffic, and hit more than a couple people even if you tried. People are not stupid, they have brains and eyballs and ears, and are a moving target. The truck is loud. You can't sneak up on anyone at 40 mph and just bash them. It is not fast enough for surprise, or slow enough for the truck to be quiet. This truck did not go on a rampage through a deaf club. And the videos show that even if the truck was speeding, it was going close to the normal speed limit for the street on top of that! If the truck was not jumping the curbs and bashing barricades, the entire story is BULLSHIT.
I WAITED TO SAY THIS UNTIL IT COULD BE ABSOLUTELY PROVEN: NO BULLETS WERE EVER FIRED AT THE TRUCK.Have any doubt they used bullet stickers? The image I used to prove it came from HERE All people need to do to bust this psy op is think about what was put right in front of everyone.
UPDATE: DO NOT MISS THE NEW BULLET STICKER SET GRAPHIC. IT IS PLACED BELOW THE PICTURES OF THE TRUCK. THEY USED SET NUMBER 3 ON THE WINDOWS.
TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND EXPLAIN IT! IN THE SECOND PICTURE, THE CAMERA ANGLE CAUGHT THE GLARE OFF THE SURFACE OF ONE OF THE BULLET STICKERS, AND THE GLARE WENT RIGHT ACROSS THE "BULLET HOLE!"
HERE ARE THE BULLET STICKER SETS. I FOUND THE ACTUAL SET. THEY USED THE "HOLLYWOOD" BULLET STICKERS THAT ARE IN THE BOTTOM SET FOR THE WINDOWS ON THE TRUCK.Bandog surprised me with his message, where he still believed the bullet holes were real. But when you compare the windshield holes in THIS PICTURE and match them up with hollywood bullet set #3, MY GOSH WE HAVE A MATCH!
UPDATE: THE NEXT DAY THEY SMASHED THE WINDSHIELD, BECAUSE PEOPLE POINTED OUT THE LACK OF CRACKS. DO NOT BE FOOLED BY THIS, THE TRUCK PHOTOS ABOVE SHOW HOW IT REALLY WAS, WITH PERFECT CLARITY.
MORAL OF THE STORY: WHEN USING WINDOW STICKERS FOR A PSY OP, BE CAREFUL OF CAMERA ANGLES AND NEVER TAKE A PICTURE WHEN THERE IS GLARE ACROSS ONE OF THE STICKERS.July 15 2016
UPDATE: The truck driver rampage in France story has multiple gaping holes which I will briefly mention here: 1. No second party cell phone coverage despite 40,000 people present. Also nothing from people on balconies who were far enough away from the action to cover it with real cameras. 2. No first responders, relatives or anyone else with the dead bodies more than a half hour after the carnage started, with the truck sitting there with windows shot. NO FIRST RESPONDERS FOR OVER A HALF HOUR? NO POLICE MOB? EVEN LONG AFTER EVERYTHING WAS COMPLETELY SECURED? Just photo op bodies laying there. YEP. STAR WARS HAPPENED. It looked so real. I never saw an ambulance in Star Wars either.
-SORRY- breaking the window on the next day to support the hoax won't cut it, when the cracks are not consistent with the "bullet holes"!
Compare the bullet holes in the windshield to the "hollywood" set above. Note: Though the windshield is now cracked, the cracks are not consistent with the bullet holes and instead match up with an apparent sledge hammer hit to the bottom left corner.IMPORTANT: Look at the hole that I pointed out in the top picture. In this picture below, the camera photographed the bullet sticker properly, so the "hole" is wide open. Some people have pointed out that the orange decal on the upper right hand side of the windshield has a black center in the hole that would not be there if a bullet sticker with a transparent center was used. It has to be a magic marker trick or the correct bullet sticker, because the real damning evidence is what was missed and out of control of the psy op team - the center of the bullet hole that is reflecting in one photo, proving there is no hole, and the other photographs of the same sticker that did not catch glare because of the camera angle, and show it as "wide open". The fact it shows wide open in one shot and has obvious glare in another shot cinches this, stickers were used no if's or buts.
In some of the much much later videos and photos they show ambulances, but if it was a truck attack happening over a mile, then even a quarter mile away, where the people were hit, there should have been mobs of ambulances while this was going on. Yet there was not even one. How would bystanders or ambulances even know it was a terror attack? They would not have stayed away, they would have responded like normal. First responders should have been at the beginning of the scene in minutes, not over an hour later, especially since this supposedly happened at a major event, where first responders are staged and ready to go, EVERYWHERE. So they got blankets to cover the bodies, but no paramedics? HOAX!
My original post follows. It is different from what other people said, so I am leaving it as is to provide perspective in addition to discoveries others have made.
Truck driver rampage story has a glaring holeHere it is: Supposedly this guy went on a 40 MPH rampage for 30 minutes. But he only went 1 mile. Common core failure. COMMON CORE BREACH! 40 mph for 30 minutes equals 20 miles. To cover only one mile, he could have only been going two miles an hour.
This page has been truncated here to reduce server load.Click here to continue to older reports