Do not underestimate the power of corruption

Too many people are saying that "If Trump cannot make it after Hillary's latest debacle, he is not fit to be President". To those who think that, WAKE UP, Trump is, in reality, bashing Hillary into oblivion and has done so ever since he gave the idea of being President a thought.

The real attitude should be: If Trump is blocked from the Presidency, it is time for the people to start killing the corrupt, who stole it all and finish the job of purging the corrupt before Russia nukes us, and the clock will be ticking. America CANNOT survive a Hillary Presidency, if Hillary gets in Russia absolutely will nuke America to stop her aggression, and that is the last thing the American people deserve when they so obviously wanted someone else. It will be either "them", or US as "they" sit in comfy caves paid for by tax dollars they stole to aid them in the survival of their corruption when it causes everything to go nuclear.

Hillary is TOAST

Hillary has two choices - Admit to being too mentally damaged to be President, or admit to being a bold faced liar

Hillary Clinton is irrevocably trapped by the following:

"Clinton told the FBI she "could not recall any briefing or training by State related to the retention of federal records or handling classified information," according to the bureau's notes of their interview with Clinton. The documents indicate Clinton told investigators she either does not "recall" or "remember" at least 39 times - often in response to questions about process, potential training or the content of specific emails."

My comment: 1. If Hillary can't recall any briefing or training by the state related to federal records, she is mentally incompetent and cannot be President. The briefings happened, she signed for them. 2. The other option is that she is a bold faced pathological liar who creatively lied about this 39 times during questioning, and therefore lacks the moral authority to be President.

Catch 22, there is NO WAY OUT, I can't believe I missed this simple observation for so long, SHE IS TOAST.

Even CNN gave up and did a 20 percent honest report which is more than enough to burn her, SHE'S TOAST.

HA HA HA, HILLARY'S LIFE BLEW UP TODAY

ALL THE WHILE SHE CLAIMED TO KNOW NOTHING ABOUT COMPUTERS, SHE WAS USING TOR FOR EVERYTHING, WHICH IS PROVEN BY THE FACT THAT SHE CLICKED ON A PORN PHISHING LINK THAT ONLY WORKED OVER TOR THAT GOT THE ATTACKERS INTO HER PRIVATE E-MAIL SERVER! HA HA HA THAT IS FUNNY!!!!

IF GEORGE SOROS REALLY THINKS HILLARY IS GUARANTEED THE PRESIDENCY, HE IS NOT SO CONNECTED OR SMART AFTER ALL, IT IS GOING TO TAKE A NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL LEVEL THREAT TO GET HER IN NOW.

FACE THE FACTS HILLARY: You used computers all through your adult life just like anyone else your age and you are completely computer literate, if not even tech saavy. You are a bold faced liar about ALL OF IT, and JUST GOT COMPLETELY BUSTED. TOR? GRANDMA DOES NOT USE TOR, IF YOU USED TOR YOU KNOW HOW TO LOG INTO A SECURE GOVERNMENT E-MAIL SERVER, PERIOD.

The Spacex rocket that blew up yesterday was definitely not a technical glitch

It looks like a UFO took it out.

Yesterday (September 1 2016) a spacex rocket with a $150 million dollar Facebook satellite that was a creation of Zukerberg and Israel blew up during testing, and not during launch. Before it blew up, a UFO showed up, fired something at the rocket, and then quickly flew away. The image here shows the UFO quite clearly. If Spacex can't explain what this UFO is, then I am going to say that either off world help arrived to keep Facebook grounded or white hats in American intelligence destroyed this rocket to keep something evil from being launched.

This UFO appears to be between the rocket and the camera filming the explosion, and the similar focus on the rocket and the object proves the object was close to the rocket and not close to the camera. It is not a bird, insect, or balloon or anything else of the sort. Its speed has been estimated by some people to have been about 500 MPH. It entered on the right hand side of the frame, fired something at the rocket when it was immediately in front of it, and exited the left hand side of the frame.

Obviously there are those trying to say this was a bird or insect or whatever, but this is one case where we got an image that quite clearly shows that cannot possibly be what this was.

This explosion started at the top of the rocket, right where the UFO was, and not near the bottom, where virtually all rocket explosions start. No malfunction caused this, if this started at the top of the rocket only a fuel tank breach in an upper stage that was not being tested could have caused this, and that means the rocket was most likely shot with something.

Important: Original reports were that this happened when they were test firing the main engines before launch, and not during refueling, as is being said now, which could (tenuously) be used as an explanation for this. But original reports said nothing about refueling, and that there was an engine test underway, which means an explosion at the top of the rocket due to a glitch is not in any way plausible.

There are a few people in the alt media that are claiming that there a war going on in space, and that something off world is trying to help us. If this object is from off world and it blew up a Facebook satellite, I'd have to say someone is trying to help because I can't imagine what was actually on that rocket if it was a completely Jewish/Israeli project and cost $150 million. That would be a GOOD rocket blast as far as I see it, and as far as I see it, this was not a technical glitch, this was caused. The only question is, who did it?

I find it interesting that this particular object looks like a text book UFO. Obviously the video of this is going to get edited.

UPDATE: The original video that had this has already been blocked on Youtube, I can't get to it anymore, with links saying the connection failed. At least this is a nice clear screen capture. And I'd bet that if this video does appear again, the UFO will suddenly have flapping wings or some other B.S.

In the original video however, what you see in this frame is what it was.

Some people are speculating that it was someone like Soros who blew this rocket up because they do not want space to be privatized. However, my take on this is that if this was a 100 percent Jewish project that was destroyed, no one in the world's power structure (which is now almost entirely Jewish) did this from the top down. I could be wrong, maybe there are disagreements, but I think it is far more probable that this was done by white hats, or "outside help", because nothing could be worse (or wanted by the elite) more than scamming Facebook going orbital compliments of Israel. We don't know what that satellite really was.

I have gone over the video again, and still say a UFO took out the Facebook rocket

It was NOT a bird!

There are five video frames that have the UFO in them despite the UFO going across the entire field of view. And all the video frames show the UFO quite clearly. This is only possible with an extremely high end video camera that had an expensive lens and super fast shutter. Why does this matter? Answer: Because it proves the UFO was very close to the rocket, and not a nearby bird. I'll go into this in detail:

Cell phones and cheap video cameras have tiny CCD sensors behind small lenses. This makes it impossible to get a clear image of a small fast moving object because the CCD needs time to gather enough light to expose a frame, and any fast moving object that crosses the entire frame in only five frames will look like a blur, and not a defined object. Why does this matter? Well, because:

Super expensive video cameras have large sensors behind expensive multi element optics that focus within a specific range the camera is set to focus on. The large sensor and wide open optics allows a fast shutter speed, which will put a clear image of a fast moving object in each frame. That is what we have with the UFO video, which proves an expensive camera filmed it. WHY IS THAT IMPORTANT? Because that alone proves that whatever this UFO was, was close to the rocket, and not a nearby bird. If it was a nearby bird, it might not have shown up in the image at all because the lens on that type of camera has a depth of field, which blurs anything that has a distance significantly different than what the lens is focusing on. Since the focus on both the rocket and the UFO are virtually identical, it proves the UFO was much larger than any bird and close to the rocket. Any bird that was close enough to the camera to show up that big would have been so out of focus it might not even noticeably show up in the frame if it was moving that fast. The way this was captured alone proves this video frame capture is legit. Now onto other details that are far more obvious:

The biggest giveaway that this is not a bird in any of these frames is the fact that the object looks the same in all frames and has a straight path across all frames. Birds flap their wings, and if it was a bird, that alone would have changed the appearance of the object. If any bird went across that large a distance without flapping it's wings, it would have fallen noticeably. Additionally, no bird could possibly fly that fast across a frame, relative to it's size on the frame. A bird would have had to have gone more than 100 mph to go that fast through the frame. There are no birds that can do that in straight and level flight.

Additionally, scam spam videos are rapidly being produced with a bird in the frames. That is not what this was, no ifs or buts. If it was a bird, this would not have been needed for debunking purposes.

This capture has an image of either a totally new type of drone, or an alien UFO. You take your pick, but whatever this was, it destroyed the rocket and that is all there is to it.

How do I feel about this? PRETTY FREAKING GOOD, it means we have powerful friends that hate Facebook.